Document Details

Title Coastal dynamics and adaptation to uncertain sea level rise: Optimal portfolios for salt marsh migration
Archive All Files / Documents / Publications / Journal Articles
Abstract

The sustainability of dynamic natural systems often depends on their capacity to adapt to uncertain climate-related changes, where different management options may be combined to facilitate this adaptation. Salt marshes exemplify such a system. Marsh sustainability under rapid sea level rise requires the preservation of transgression zones - undeveloped uplands onto which marshes migrate. Whether these uplands eventually become marsh depends on uncertain sea level rise and natural dynamics that determine migration onto different land types. Under conditions such as these, systematically diversified management actions generally outperform ad hoc or non-diversified alternatives. This paper develops the first adaptation portfolio model designed to optimize the benefits of a migrating coastal system. Results are illustrated using a case study of marsh conservation in Virginia, USA. Results suggest that models of this type can enhance adaptation benefits beyond those available through current approaches.

Contributors O. D. Vinent, R. J. Johnston, M. Kirwan, A. Leroux and V. Martin
Citation

Vinent, O.D., Johnston, R.J., Kirwan, M., Leroux, A. and Martin, V. 2019. Coastal dynamics and adaptation to uncertain sea level rise: Optimal portfolios for salt marsh migration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102262)

Key Words benefit, climate change, diversification, geomorphology, optimal conservation, risk, spatial, wetland
File Date 2019
Web Link Web link
view/download Web link
LTER
NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants OCE-9982133, OCE-0620959, OCE-1237140 and OCE-1832178. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.