Home > Data > Data Search > Data Catalog

GCE-LTER Data Catalog Information

Contributor:    Core Area/Theme:    Site:
Geographic Bounds:  West:   East:   South:   North:   (degrees) all data within bounds
Study Period:   to   (M/D/YYYY) within dates contains dates Data Access:
Subject Text:    clear search term  add search term
Sort by:    Ascending Descending     Results/page:    (0 = unlimited)
6 Records
Data Set Period Theme Contributor Added

PLT-GCED-2101:
Nutrient Network (NutNet) basic sampling at the Georgia Coastal Ecosystems LTER in summer 2019.

 06/11/2019 - 07/23/2019 Plant Ecology Steven C. Pennings 01/20/2021

GIS-GCEL-1812a:
May to July 2018 regions of interest (ROIs) of tidal marsh and tidal forest plant species to be used as ground reference data in habitat mapping

 05/23/2018 - 07/07/2018 Geospatial Analysis Christine M. Hladik 12/04/2018

GIS-GCEL-1812:
May to July 2018 ground control points GPS coordinates of tidal marsh and tidal forest plant species to be used as ground control points in habitat mapping

 05/23/2018 - 07/07/2018 Geospatial Analysis Christine M. Hladik 12/03/2018

GIS-GCET-1810:
Cross-site comparison of historical trends in marsh change at three LTER sites: GCE, VCR, and PIE.

 11/11/1938 - 01/01/2013 Geospatial Analysis Christine Burns 10/09/2018

PLT-GCET-1801:
Spartina alterniflora aboveground biomass patterns from Landsat 5 TM imagery (1984-2011) and external driver data used in multivariate analysis.

 03/12/1984 - 12/31/2011 Plant Ecology John O'Donnell 01/29/2018

ANT-GCES-1308:
Archaeological shovel test data for Little Sapelo Island, Mary Hammock, Patterson Island, and Pumpkin Hammock; Spring 2007, Summer 2007 and 2008

 03/16/2007 - 07/31/2008 Anthropology John A. Turck 08/01/2013
LTER
NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants OCE-9982133, OCE-0620959, OCE-1237140, OCE-1832178 and OCE-2425396. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.