Home > Data > Data Search > Data Catalog > Data Set Summary | Update Metadata (contributor) | Copy as Template (GCE)
Files Jump to Files

GCE-LTER Data Set Summary

Accession: HYD-GCED-2310 Research Theme: Hydrography/Hydrology (Directed Study)
Contributor: Christopher B. Craft
Title: Comparing vertical accretion, organic carbon (C) sequestration, and nitrogen burial between a natural, never diked tidal salt marsh and a hydrologically restored tidal salt marsh on Sapelo Island, Georgia.
Abstract: Restoration of tidal marshes throughout the 20th century have attempted to bring back important functions of natural tidal systems. In this study, vertical accretion, organic carbon (C) sequestration, and nitrogen burial were compared between a natural, never diked tidal salt marsh and a hydrologically restored tidal salt marsh on Sapelo Island, Georgia to examine the impacts of restoration years later. On Sapelo Island there are two marshes near the University of Georgia Marine Institute, one of which is a natural marsh, and one of which is a restored marsh. The restored marsh had been diked in 1948, and the dike was breached, allowing for the marsh to be restored, in 1956. Soil cores were collected from both marshes, and the sediments were analysed for Nitrogen and Carbon concentrations and bulk density. This analysis was used to determine accretion rates for the two marshes as well as changes in the restored marsh since the dike was breached. Nitrogen burial, carbon sequestration, and soil accretion in the restored marsh as compared to the natural marsh were the focus of this study.
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/dcca1b753317960ae1642f4d7fb47c1d
Key Words: accretion, carbon, carbon cycling, nitrogen cycling, salt marshes, Sapelo Island, UGA
LTER Core Area: Organic Matter
Research Themes: Hydrography/Hydrology, Marsh Ecology
Study Period: 01-Jan-2020 to 16-Nov-2022
Study Sites:
Sapelo -- Sapelo Island, Sapelo Island, Georgia
» Download Geographic Coverage: Google Earth
Research Protocols:

SALTEx - CHN Anaysis (Georgia Coastal Ecosystems LTER)

Downloads: Information

Data Table: HYD-GCED-2310 (Main data table for data set HYD-GCED-2310, 166 records)

Access: Public (released 02-Oct-2024)

Metadata: Text (ESA FLED), XML (Ecological Metadata Language)

Data Formats: Spreadsheet (CSV) [17.05kb],  Text File [15.46kb],  MATLAB (GCE Toolbox) [27.54kb],  MATLAB (Variables) [NaNkb],  Text Report [32.53kb]

Column List:(hide)

Column Name Units Type Description
1 Site_ID none string Natural or restored marsh
2 Core_ID none string Name of Core
3 Latitude degrees floating-point Latitude of core sample
4 Longitude degrees floating-point Longitude of core sample
5 Depth_range cm string Depth range of core section
6 Bulk_Density g/cm3 floating-point Density of the soil
7 Organic_C percent floating-point Percent of carbon in the soil
8 Total_N percent floating-point Percent of N in the soil
9 Depth_Increment cm integer Increment used to separate the soil core for analysis
10 Carbon g/g floating-point Carbon measured g/g
11 Nitrogen g/g floating-point Nitrogen measured g/g
12 Carbon.Density g/m2 floating-point Total carbon mass per unit area
13 Nitrogen.Density g/m2 floating-point Total nitrogen mass per unit area
Statistics: Generate script code to retrieve data tables for analysis in: MATLAB, R, SAS, SPSS
Citation: Craft, Christopher B. 2023. Comparing vertical accretion, organic carbon (C) sequestration, and nitrogen burial between a natural, never diked tidal salt marsh and a hydrologically restored tidal salt marsh on Sapelo Island, Georgia. Georgia Coastal Ecosystems LTER Project, University of Georgia, Long Term Ecological Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.6073/pasta/dcca1b753317960ae1642f4d7fb47c1d

» Help about file formats, technical specifications and file versioning

LTER
NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants OCE-9982133, OCE-0620959, OCE-1237140, OCE-1832178 and OCE-2425396. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.